On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:12:53PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> While working on TTM cleanups I've found that the io_reserve_lru used by
> Nouveau is actually not working at all.
>
> In general we should remove driver specific handling from the memory
> management, so this patch moves the io_reserve_lru handling into Nouveau
> instead.
>
> The patch should be functional correct, but is only compile tested!
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h | 3 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 2 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c | 43 +++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> index e918b437af17..9532ad1bd474 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ nouveau_bo_del_ttm(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> if (unlikely(nvbo->bo.base.filp))
> DRM_ERROR("bo %p still attached to GEM object\n", bo);
> WARN_ON(nvbo->pin_refcnt > 0);
> + nouveau_bo_del_io_reserve_lru(bo);
> nv10_bo_put_tile_region(dev, nvbo->tile, NULL);
> kfree(nvbo);
> }
> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ nouveau_bo_init(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, u64 size, int align, u32 flags,
> nouveau_bo_fixup_align(nvbo, flags, &align, &size);
> nvbo->bo.mem.num_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> nouveau_bo_placement_set(nvbo, flags, 0);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->io_reserve_lru);
>
> ret = ttm_bo_init(nvbo->bo.bdev, &nvbo->bo, size, type,
> &nvbo->placement, align >> PAGE_SHIFT, false,
> @@ -566,6 +568,26 @@ nouveau_bo_sync_for_cpu(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo)
> PAGE_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> }
>
> +void nouveau_bo_add_io_reserve_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_bdev(bo->bdev);
> + struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = nouveau_bo(bo);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> + list_move_tail(&nvbo->io_reserve_lru, &drm->ttm.io_reserve_lru);
> + mutex_unlock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +void nouveau_bo_del_io_reserve_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_bdev(bo->bdev);
> + struct nouveau_bo *nvbo = nouveau_bo(bo);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> + list_del_init(&nvbo->io_reserve_lru);
> + mutex_unlock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> +}
> +
> int
> nouveau_bo_validate(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo, bool interruptible,
> bool no_wait_gpu)
> @@ -674,8 +696,6 @@ nouveau_bo_init_mem_type(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, uint32_t type,
> }
>
> man->func = &nouveau_vram_manager;
> - man->io_reserve_fastpath = false;
> - man->use_io_reserve_lru = true;
> } else {
> man->func = &ttm_bo_manager_func;
> }
> @@ -1304,6 +1324,8 @@ nouveau_bo_move_ntfy(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
> if (bo->destroy != nouveau_bo_del_ttm)
> return;
>
> + nouveau_bo_del_io_reserve_lru(bo);
> +
> if (mem && new_reg->mem_type != TTM_PL_SYSTEM &&
> mem->mem.page == nvbo->page) {
> list_for_each_entry(vma, &nvbo->vma_list, head) {
> @@ -1426,6 +1448,30 @@ nouveau_bo_verify_access(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct file *filp)
> filp->private_data);
> }
>
> +static void
> +nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(struct nouveau_drm *drm, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> +{
> + struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
> +
> + if (!reg->bus.base)
> + return; /* already freed */
> +
> + if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
> + switch (reg->mem_type) {
> + case TTM_PL_TT:
> + if (mem->kind)
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> + nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + reg->bus.base = 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> {
> @@ -1433,18 +1479,26 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_bdev(bdev);
> struct nvkm_device *device = nvxx_device(&drm->client.device);
> struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
> + struct nouveau_bo *nvbo;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (reg->bus.base)
> + return 0; /* already mapped */
>
> reg->bus.addr = NULL;
> reg->bus.offset = 0;
> reg->bus.size = reg->num_pages << PAGE_SHIFT;
> - reg->bus.base = 0;
> reg->bus.is_iomem = false;
> if (!(man->flags & TTM_MEMTYPE_FLAG_MAPPABLE))
> return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> +retry:
> switch (reg->mem_type) {
> case TTM_PL_SYSTEM:
> /* System memory */
> - return 0;
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> case TTM_PL_TT:
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_AGP)
> if (drm->agp.bridge) {
> @@ -1468,7 +1522,6 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> } args;
> u64 handle, length;
> u32 argc = 0;
> - int ret;
>
> switch (mem->mem.object.oclass) {
> case NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50:
> @@ -1492,38 +1545,45 @@ nouveau_ttm_io_mem_reserve(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> ret = nvif_object_map_handle(&mem->mem.object,
> &args, argc,
> &handle, &length);
> - if (ret != 1)
> - return ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + if (ret != 1) {
> + ret = ret ? ret : -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ret = 0;
>
> reg->bus.base = 0;
> reg->bus.offset = handle;
> }
> break;
> default:
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> - return 0;
> +
> +out:
> + if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
> + nvbo = list_first_entry_or_null(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_lru,
> + typeof(*nvbo),
> + io_reserve_lru);
> + if (nvbo) {
> + list_del_init(&nvbo->io_reserve_lru);
> + ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(&nvbo->bo);
> + nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(drm, &nvbo->bo.mem);
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void
> nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, struct ttm_mem_reg *reg)
> {
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_bdev(bdev);
> - struct nouveau_mem *mem = nouveau_mem(reg);
>
> - if (drm->client.mem->oclass >= NVIF_CLASS_MEM_NV50) {
> - switch (reg->mem_type) {
> - case TTM_PL_TT:
> - if (mem->kind)
> - nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> - break;
> - case TTM_PL_VRAM:
> - nvif_object_unmap_handle(&mem->mem.object);
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> - }
> + mutex_lock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> + nouveau_ttm_io_mem_free_locked(drm, reg);
> + mutex_unlock(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> index 62930d834fba..b8a17bc19d7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.h
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct nouveau_bo {
> bool force_coherent;
> struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj kmap;
> struct list_head head;
> + struct list_head io_reserve_lru;
>
> /* protected by ttm_bo_reserve() */
> struct drm_file *reserved_by;
> @@ -92,6 +93,8 @@ int nouveau_bo_validate(struct nouveau_bo *, bool interruptible,
> bool no_wait_gpu);
> void nouveau_bo_sync_for_device(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo);
> void nouveau_bo_sync_for_cpu(struct nouveau_bo *nvbo);
> +void nouveau_bo_add_io_reserve_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> +void nouveau_bo_del_io_reserve_lru(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
>
> /* TODO: submit equivalent to TTM generic API upstream? */
> static inline void __iomem *
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> index 70f34cacc552..060e2ab1fd95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
> @@ -158,6 +158,8 @@ struct nouveau_drm {
> int type_vram;
> int type_host[2];
> int type_ncoh[2];
> + struct mutex io_reserve_mutex;
> + struct list_head io_reserve_lru;
> } ttm;
>
> /* GEM interface support */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> index f0daf958e03a..7f8495066e8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_ttm.c
> @@ -162,13 +162,51 @@ const struct ttm_mem_type_manager_func nv04_gart_manager = {
> .debug = nouveau_manager_debug
> };
>
> +static vm_fault_t nouveau_ttm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +{
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = vma->vm_private_data;
> + pgprot_t prot;
> + vm_fault_t ret;
> +
> + ret = ttm_bo_vm_reserve(bo, vmf);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + nouveau_bo_del_io_reserve_lru(bo);
Isn't this opening up a can of worms (in theory) where a lot of concurrent
faults will all fail because they're all removed themselves from the lru,
so can't see anyone else to throw out?
Same problem really that ttm had (well still has I think for !amdgpu) with
its other lru ...
Or am I getting totally lost again here?
-Daniel
> +
> + prot = vm_get_page_prot(vma->vm_flags);
> + ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf, prot, TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT);
> + if (ret == VM_FAULT_RETRY && !(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT))
> + return ret;
> +
> + nouveau_bo_add_io_reserve_lru(bo);
> +
> + dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static struct vm_operations_struct nouveau_ttm_vm_ops = {
> + .fault = nouveau_ttm_fault,
> + .open = ttm_bo_vm_open,
> + .close = ttm_bo_vm_close,
> + .access = ttm_bo_vm_access
> +};
> +
> int
> nouveau_ttm_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> struct drm_file *file_priv = filp->private_data;
> struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(file_priv->minor->dev);
> + int ret;
>
> - return ttm_bo_mmap(filp, vma, &drm->ttm.bdev);
> + ret = ttm_bo_mmap(filp, vma, &drm->ttm.bdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + vma->vm_ops = &nouveau_ttm_vm_ops;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int
> @@ -272,6 +310,9 @@ nouveau_ttm_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + mutex_init(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_mutex);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drm->ttm.io_reserve_lru);
> +
> NV_INFO(drm, "VRAM: %d MiB\n", (u32)(drm->gem.vram_available >> 20));
> NV_INFO(drm, "GART: %d MiB\n", (u32)(drm->gem.gart_available >> 20));
> return 0;
> --
> 2.14.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
