On 26/09/2019 14:37, Koenig, Christian wrote: > Am 26.09.19 um 14:31 schrieb Steven Price: >> drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() attempts to free finished jobs, however because >> it is called as the condition of wait_event_interruptible() it must not >> sleep. Unfortuantly some free callbacks (notibly for Panfrost) do sleep. >> >> Instead let's rename drm_sched_cleanup_jobs() to >> drm_sched_get_cleanup_job() and simply return a job for processing if >> there is one. The caller can then call the free_job() callback outside >> the wait_event_interruptible() where sleeping is possible before >> re-checking and returning to sleep if necessary. >> >> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Changes from v2: >> * Actually move list_first_entry_or_null() within the lock >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 42 ++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >> index 9a0ee74d82dc..e4bd792f2b29 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c >> @@ -622,43 +622,41 @@ static void drm_sched_process_job(struct dma_fence *f, struct dma_fence_cb *cb) >> } >> >> /** >> - * drm_sched_cleanup_jobs - destroy finished jobs >> + * drm_sched_get_cleanup_job - fetch the next finished job to be destroyed >> * >> * @sched: scheduler instance >> * >> - * Remove all finished jobs from the mirror list and destroy them. >> + * Returns the next finished job from the mirror list (if there is one) >> + * ready for it to be destroyed. >> */ >> -static void drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched) >> +static struct drm_sched_job * >> +drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched) >> { >> + struct drm_sched_job *job = NULL; >> unsigned long flags; >> >> /* Don't destroy jobs while the timeout worker is running */ >> if (sched->timeout != MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT && >> !cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr)) >> - return; >> - >> + return NULL; >> >> - while (!list_empty(&sched->ring_mirror_list)) { >> - struct drm_sched_job *job; >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); >> >> - job = list_first_entry(&sched->ring_mirror_list, >> + job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->ring_mirror_list, >> struct drm_sched_job, node); >> - if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished)) >> - break; >> >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); >> + if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished)) { >> /* remove job from ring_mirror_list */ >> list_del_init(&job->node); >> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); >> - >> - sched->ops->free_job(job); >> + } else { >> + job = NULL; >> + /* queue timeout for next job */ >> + drm_sched_start_timeout(sched); > > Sorry I've only seen this right now: This won't work. > > See you always need to start the timeout, or cancel_delayed_work() will > abort the whole thing after returning the first job. Good spot! My logic was that drm_sched_main() would call again and that would re-arm the timeout after the job has been completed. But looking at this more closely I see that isn't actually going to work reliably - if the work has been cancelled the first time then cancel_delayed_work() will return false causing an early out and the timeout isn't re-armed. Is it as simple as moving drm_sched_start_timeout() out of the else case and unconditionally re-arming the timeout? I'm worried about races with the job that is being returned, although it has already been removed from ring_mirror_list so perhaps it's safe to do? Alternatively the caller could manually re-arm the timeout after handling the job free. Steve > Christian. > >> } >> >> - /* queue timeout for next job */ >> - spin_lock_irqsave(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); >> - drm_sched_start_timeout(sched); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sched->job_list_lock, flags); >> >> + return job; >> } >> >> /** >> @@ -698,12 +696,18 @@ static int drm_sched_main(void *param) >> struct drm_sched_fence *s_fence; >> struct drm_sched_job *sched_job; >> struct dma_fence *fence; >> + struct drm_sched_job *cleanup_job = NULL; >> >> wait_event_interruptible(sched->wake_up_worker, >> - (drm_sched_cleanup_jobs(sched), >> + (cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched)) || >> (!drm_sched_blocked(sched) && >> (entity = drm_sched_select_entity(sched))) || >> - kthread_should_stop())); >> + kthread_should_stop()); >> + >> + while (cleanup_job) { >> + sched->ops->free_job(cleanup_job); >> + cleanup_job = drm_sched_get_cleanup_job(sched); >> + } >> >> if (!entity) >> continue; > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel