Re: [PATCH 04/11] drm/nouveau: gp10b: Add custom L2 cache implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thierry,

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:54:43PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > Joerg, to summarize: the proposal here is to move the declaration of the
> > iommu_fwspec outside of the IOMMU_API guard and provide a dummy
> > implementation of dev_iommu_fwspec_get() to allow this code to be built
> > without the #ifdef guards. We had discussed something similar about 5
> > years back and at the time you had been opposed:
> > 
> > 	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/1406897113-20099-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx/
> > 
> > The case here is slightly different and a lot of time has passed since,
> > so just wanted to ask if your opinion here is the same, or whether you
> > would accept a patch to make this buildable without resorting to
> > #ifdef'ery.

This is about DRM, so if it is fine to build drm/nouveau without
IOMMU-API I am also fine with dummys for dev_iommu_fwspec_get() and a
dummy 'struct iommu_fwspec'.

Regards,

	Joerg
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux