> > 'Git bisect' has identified the following commits as being 'bad'. > > > > b96f3e7c8069b749a40ca3a33c97835d57dd45d2 is the first bad commit > > commit b96f3e7c8069b749a40ca3a33c97835d57dd45d2 > > Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon Aug 5 16:01:10 2019 +0200 > > > > drm/ttm: use gem vma_node > > > > Drop vma_node from ttm_buffer_object, use the gem struct > > (base.vma_node) instead. > > > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190805140119.7337-9-kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx > > Today, I upgraded the kernel to 5.3.0-next-20190919, which booted fine > > with no Xorg regressions to report. > > > > Just wondering if the earlier kernels would not boot for me because of > > the changes introduced by the 'bad' commits being perhaps incomplete? Yes, we had a regression in nouveau, fixed by this patch (in drm-misc-next): commit 019cbd4a4feb3aa3a917d78e7110e3011bbff6d5 Author: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed Aug 14 11:00:48 2019 +0200 drm/nouveau: Initialize GEM object before TTM object TTM assumes that drivers initialize the embedded GEM object before calling the ttm_bo_init() function. This is not currently the case in the Nouveau driver. Fix this by splitting up nouveau_bo_new() into nouveau_bo_alloc() and nouveau_bo_init() so that the GEM can be initialized before TTM BO initialization when necessary. Fixes: b96f3e7c8069 ("drm/ttm: use gem vma_node") Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190814093524.GA31345@ulmo HTH, Gerd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
