Hi Dmitry,
(CC'ing Heikki as the original author of software nodes support)
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
s/bit/but/
> works with arbitrary firmware node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On a side note, as I'm not very familiar with software nodes, I tried to
see how they are to be used, and it seems they are completely
undocumented :-( Heikki, is this something that could be fixed ?
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> index 61cc2354ef1b..d9c9c9ebad2b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
> @@ -284,8 +284,8 @@ static int tfp410_get_connector_properties(struct tfp410 *dvi)
> else
> dvi->connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVID;
>
> - dvi->hpd = fwnode_get_named_gpiod(&connector_node->fwnode,
> - "hpd-gpios", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");
> + dvi->hpd = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(&connector_node->fwnode,
> + "hpd", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");
> if (IS_ERR(dvi->hpd)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(dvi->hpd);
> dvi->hpd = NULL;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
