On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box new > enough to have a GMA500 8) Probably not, but I saw more #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI below and assumed there's a good reason for that. Out of curiously, is a scenario where a GMA500 is assigned to a KVM guest which doesn't have ACPI support plausible? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel