On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:49:48 +0200 Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box new > > enough to have a GMA500 8) > > Probably not, but I saw more #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI below and assumed > there's a good reason for that. > > Out of curiously, is a scenario where a GMA500 is assigned to a KVM > guest which doesn't have ACPI support plausible? I doubt it - the GMA500 is doing direct memory access via the GTT and hitting hardware level stuff. I don't believe any work has ever been done for Imagination based graphics pass through. Alan _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
