Noticed this while working on adding a drm_dp_decode_sideband_req().
DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY/DP_POWER_UP_PHY both use the same struct as
DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES, so we can just combine their cases.
Changes since v2:
* Fix commit message
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Harry Wentland <hwentlan@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 6f7f449ca12b..1c862749cb63 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
switch (req->req_type) {
case DP_ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES:
+ case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY:
+ case DP_POWER_UP_PHY:
buf[idx] = (req->u.port_num.port_number & 0xf) << 4;
idx++;
break;
@@ -358,12 +360,6 @@ static void drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_req_body *req,
memcpy(&buf[idx], req->u.i2c_write.bytes, req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes);
idx += req->u.i2c_write.num_bytes;
break;
-
- case DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY:
- case DP_POWER_UP_PHY:
- buf[idx] = (req->u.port_num.port_number & 0xf) << 4;
- idx++;
- break;
}
raw->cur_len = idx;
}
--
2.21.0
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
