On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:12 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 9:45 PM Kenny Ho <y2kenny@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:57 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Iterating over minors for cgroups sounds very, very wrong. Why do we care
> > > whether a buffer was allocated through kms dumb vs render nodes?
> > >
> > > I'd expect all the cgroup stuff to only work on drm_device, if it does
> > > care about devices.
> > >
> > > (I didn't look through the patch series to find out where exactly you're
> > > using this, so maybe I'm off the rails here).
> >
> > I am exposing this to remove the need to keep track of a separate list
> > of available drm_device in the system (to remove the registering and
> > unregistering of drm_device to the cgroup subsystem and just use
> > drm_minor as the single source of truth.) I am only filtering out the
> > render nodes minor because they point to the same drm_device and is
> > confusing.
> >
> > Perhaps I missed an obvious way to list the drm devices without
> > iterating through the drm_minors? (I probably jumped to the minors
> > because $major:$minor is the convention to address devices in cgroup.)
>
> Create your own if there's nothing, because you need to anyway:
> - You need special locking anyway, we can't just block on the idr lock
> for everything.
> - This needs to refcount drm_device, no the minors.
>
> Iterating over stuff still feels kinda wrong still, because normally
> the way we register/unregister userspace api (and cgroups isn't
> anything else from a drm driver pov) is by adding more calls to
> drm_dev_register/unregister. If you put a drm_cg_register/unregister
> call in there we have a clean separation, and you can track all the
> currently active devices however you want. Iterating over objects that
> can be hotunplugged any time tends to get really complicated really
> quickly.
Um... I thought this is what I had previously. Did I misunderstood
your feedback from v3? Doesn't drm_minor already include all these
facilities so isn't creating my own kind of reinventing the wheel?
(as I did previously?) drm_minor_register is called inside
drm_dev_register so isn't leveraging existing drm_minor facilities
much better solution?
Kenny
>
>
> >
> > Kenny
> >
> > > -Daniel
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h | 4 ----
> > > > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 4 ++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > > > index 862621494a93..000cddabd970 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> > > > @@ -254,11 +254,13 @@ struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(unsigned int minor_id)
> > > >
> > > > return minor;
> > > > }
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_minor_acquire);
> > > >
> > > > void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor)
> > > > {
> > > > drm_dev_put(minor->dev);
> > > > }
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_minor_release);
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > * DOC: driver instance overview
> > > > @@ -1078,6 +1080,23 @@ int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name)
> > > > }
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_set_unique);
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * drm_minor_for_each - Iterate through all stored DRM minors
> > > > + * @fn: Function to be called for each pointer.
> > > > + * @data: Data passed to callback function.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * The callback function will be called for each @drm_minor entry, passing
> > > > + * the minor, the entry and @data.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * If @fn returns anything other than %0, the iteration stops and that
> > > > + * value is returned from this function.
> > > > + */
> > > > +int drm_minor_for_each(int (*fn)(int id, void *p, void *data), void *data)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return idr_for_each(&drm_minors_idr, fn, data);
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_minor_for_each);
> > > > +
> > > > /*
> > > > * DRM Core
> > > > * The DRM core module initializes all global DRM objects and makes them
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> > > > index e19ac7ca602d..6bfad76f8e78 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_internal.h
> > > > @@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ void drm_prime_destroy_file_private(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv);
> > > > void drm_prime_remove_buf_handle_locked(struct drm_prime_file_private *prime_fpriv,
> > > > struct dma_buf *dma_buf);
> > > >
> > > > -/* drm_drv.c */
> > > > -struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(unsigned int minor_id);
> > > > -void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor);
> > > > -
> > > > /* drm_vblank.c */
> > > > void drm_vblank_disable_and_save(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe);
> > > > void drm_vblank_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev);
> > > > diff --git a/include/drm/drm_drv.h b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > > > index 68ca736c548d..24f8d054c570 100644
> > > > --- a/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > > > +++ b/include/drm/drm_drv.h
> > > > @@ -799,5 +799,9 @@ static inline bool drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(struct drm_device *dev)
> > > >
> > > > int drm_dev_set_unique(struct drm_device *dev, const char *name);
> > > >
> > > > +int drm_minor_for_each(int (*fn)(int id, void *p, void *data), void *data);
> > > > +
> > > > +struct drm_minor *drm_minor_acquire(unsigned int minor_id);
> > > > +void drm_minor_release(struct drm_minor *minor);
> > > >
> > > > #endif
> > > > --
> > > > 2.22.0
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Vetter
> > > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > > http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
