On 07/19, Daniel Vetter wrote: > It's the recommended version, wait_for_vblanks is a bit a hacky > interim thing that predates all the flip_done tracking. It's > unfortunately still the default ... Just one question, is it safe to replace drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks by drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done? I noticed that only six drivers use these functions; they are: * atmel-hlcdc * mediatek * msm * tegra * tilcdc * virtio If we change these drivers, can we drop the helper drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks? Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Haneen Mohammed <hamohammed.sa@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c > index 44ab9f8ef8be..80524a22412a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vkms/vkms_drv.c > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static void vkms_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state) > > drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(old_state); > > - drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_vblanks(dev, old_state); > + drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done(dev, old_state); > > for_each_old_crtc_in_state(old_state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i) { > struct vkms_crtc_state *vkms_state = > -- > 2.22.0 > -- Rodrigo Siqueira Software Engineer, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) https://siqueira.tech
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel