>-----Original Message----- >From: dri-devel [mailto:dri-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf >Of Christian König >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 10:57 AM >To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx; sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx; linux- >media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [PATCH 2/9] dma-buf: make to_dma_fence_array NULL safe > >A bit surprising that this wasn't already the case. > >Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> >--- > include/linux/dma-fence-array.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h b/include/linux/dma-fence- >array.h >index 303dd712220f..f99cd7eb24e0 100644 >--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h >+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h >@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static inline bool dma_fence_is_array(struct dma_fence >*fence) > static inline struct dma_fence_array * > to_dma_fence_array(struct dma_fence *fence) > { >- if (fence->ops != &dma_fence_array_ops) >+ if (!fence || fence->ops != &dma_fence_array_ops) > return NULL; > > return container_of(fence, struct dma_fence_array, base); It looks like dma_fence_is_array() has the same issue. Is it worth fixing? Mike >-- >2.17.1 > >_______________________________________________ >dri-devel mailing list >dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
