Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-08-21 16:24:22) > Quoting Christian König (2019-08-21 13:31:45) > > @@ -117,17 +120,10 @@ i915_gem_busy_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > busy_check_writer(rcu_dereference(obj->base.resv->fence_excl)); > > > > /* Translate shared fences to READ set of engines */ > > - list = rcu_dereference(obj->base.resv->fence); > > - if (list) { > > - unsigned int shared_count = list->shared_count, i; > > - > > - for (i = 0; i < shared_count; ++i) { > > - struct dma_fence *fence = > > - rcu_dereference(list->shared[i]); > > - > > - args->busy |= busy_check_reader(fence); > > - } > > - } > > + readers = dma_resv_fences_get_rcu(&obj->base.resv->readers); > > + dma_fence_array_for_each(fence, cursor, readers) > > + args->busy |= busy_check_reader(fence); > > + dma_fence_put(readers); > > That's underwhelming, the full-mb shows up in scaling tests (I'll test > the impact of this series later). Something like, To put some numbers to it, adding the full-mb adds 5ns to a single thread on Kabylake and 20ns under contention. -Chris _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel