On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:18:38PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Fabrizio, > > (CC'ing Greg as the architect of the SPDX move) _one of_, not the one that did the most of he work, that would be Thomas :) > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:04:27PM +0100, Fabrizio Castro wrote: > > The information represented by drm_bridge_timings is also > > needed by panels, therefore rename drm_bridge_timings to > > drm_timings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-renesas-soc/msg43271.html > > > > --- > > v1->v2: > > * new patch > > > > I have copied the license from include/drm/drm_bridge.h as that's > > where the struct originally came from. What's the right SPDX license > > to use in this case? > > https://wiki.spdx.org/view/Legal_Team/Decisions/Dealing_with_Public_Domain_within_SPDX_Files > > Greg, any idea on how we should handle this ? Ugh, what lunacy. But drm_bridge.h is NOT under any "public domain" license, so why is that an issue here? This looks like a "normal" bsd 3 clause license to me, right? So I would just use "BSD-3-Clause" as the SPDX license here, if I were doing this patch... thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
