Hi Laurent. On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 06:44:26PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Hi Laurent. > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:10:52PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > This patch series adds DT bindings and drivers for 6 panels used by > > omapdrm. They are meant to replace the corresponding omapdrm-specific > > drivers from drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/displays/ that will be removed in a > > subsequent patch series, once the omapdrm driver switches fully to the > > drm_panel API. > > > > There's nothing very special here. The first three patches add DT vendor > > prefixes and DT bindings. The last six patches add new panel drivers. > > > > Please see individual patches for changelogs. Sam, all the patches have > > now been acked (resulting in a TODO list in 7/9 and a rework of 8/9). > > Would you merge this in drm-misc ? > > > > The patches are based on top of drm-misc-next and can be found at > > > > git://linuxtv.org/pinchartl/media.git omapdrm/panels > > > > Laurent Pinchart (9): > > dt-bindings: Add vendor prefix for LG Display > > dt-bindings: Add legacy 'toppoly' vendor prefix > > dt-bindings: display: panel: Add bindings for NEC NL8048HL11 panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the LG Philips LB035Q02 panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the NEC NL8048HL11 panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the Sharp LS037V7DW01 panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the Sony ACX565AKM panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the Toppoly TD028TTEC1 panel > > drm/panel: Add driver for the Toppoly TD043MTEA1 panel > > dim was not too happy with the patches. > checkpatch --strict triggers too much: > > drm/panel: Add driver for the LG Philips LB035Q02 panel > -:24: WARNING:CONFIG_DESCRIPTION: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully > #24: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig:106: > +config DRM_PANEL_LG_LB035Q02 > > -:235: CHECK:COMPARISON_TO_NULL: Comparison to NULL could be written "!lcd" > #235: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lg-lb035q02.c:183: > + if (lcd == NULL) > > drm/panel: Add driver for the NEC NL8048HL11 panel > -:23: WARNING:CONFIG_DESCRIPTION: please write a paragraph that describes the config symbol fully > #23: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/Kconfig:122: > +config DRM_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11 > > -:47: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANGES: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? > #47: > new file mode 100644 > > -:136: CHECK:USLEEP_RANGE: usleep_range is preferred over udelay; see Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst > #136: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c:85: > + udelay(20); > > -:234: CHECK:COMPARISON_TO_NULL: Comparison to NULL could be written "!lcd" > #234: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-nec-nl8048hl11.c:183: > + if (lcd == NULL) > > etc.. > > Nothing serious but please give them an extra round so we do > not have extra patches flowing in to fix these trivial things. > There is a few "line too long" that I personally would ignore. > But warnings lige (lcd == NULL) => (!lcd) I would fix. > > And there was too much to fix while applying. Forget this. I could use this existing little task to avoid some boring work stuff. Updated all checkpatch issues I considered relevant: o (lcd == NULL) => (!lcd) o <1 << X) => BIT(X) And removed the __exit_p() annotation for a remove function to fix a build warning. Build tested and applied to drm-misc-next. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel