Re: [PATCH] dma-buf/sw_sync: Synchronize signal vs syncpt free

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sasha,

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 07:05:47PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
> fixing commit: d3862e44daa7 dma-buf/sw-sync: Fix locking around sync_timeline lists.
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.8, v4.19.66, v4.14.138, v4.9.189.
> 
> v5.2.8: Build OK!
> v4.19.66: Build OK!
> v4.14.138: Build OK!
> v4.9.189: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
>     Unable to calculate
> 
> 
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?

The backporting instruction has an explicit # v4.14+ in there, so failure
to apply to older kernels is expected.

Can you perhaps teach this trick to your script perhaps? Iirc we're using
the official format even.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux