Hi Laurent/Noralf. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 06:35:42PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > Den 11.08.2019 18.41, skrev Sam Ravnborg: > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:52:49PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote: > > >> Add support for panels that use the DPI interface. > > >> ILI9341 has onboard RAM so the assumption made here is that all such > > >> panels support pixel upload over DBI. > > >> > > >> The presence/absense of the Device Tree 'port' node decides which > > >> interface is used for pixel transfer. > > > > > > Have you consiered if the compatible could be used to determine the use > > > of a panel? Then it is more explicit how the HW is described in DT. > > > > Is that common to use the compatible to tell which interface to use? > > I don't know what best practice is here. > > Usually the compatible identifies the device, not the interface. > Additional properties are preferred to describe the interface. Thanks Laurent. Then the ports idea as implmented by the patch seems to fly. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
