Hi,
Thank you for your remarks. I will take them into account while preparing RFCv2.
On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 10:52 +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19. 7. 23. 오후 9:20, Artur Świgoń wrote:
> > This patch adds interconnect functionality to the exynos-bus devfreq
> > driver.
> >
> > The SoC topology is a graph (or, more specifically, a tree) and most of its
> > edges are taken from the devfreq parent-child hierarchy (cf.
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/exynos-bus.txt). The previous
> > patch adds missing edges to the DT (under the name 'parent'). Due to
> > unspecified relative probing order, -EPROBE_DEFER may be propagated to
> > guarantee that a child is probed before its parent.
> >
> > Each bus is now an interconnect provider and an interconnect node as well
> > (cf. Documentation/interconnect/interconnect.rst), i.e. every bus registers
> > itself as a node. Node IDs are not hardcoded but rather assigned at
> > runtime, in probing order (subject to the above-mentioned exception
> > regarding relative order). This approach allows for using this driver with
> > various Exynos SoCs.
> >
> > The devfreq target() callback provided by exynos-bus now selects either the
> > frequency calculated by the devfreq governor or the frequency requested via
> > the interconnect API for the given node, whichever is higher.
>
> Basically, I agree to support the QoS requirement between devices.
> But, I think that need to consider the multiple cases.
>
>
> 1. When changing the devfreq governor by user,
> For example of the connection between bus_dmc/leftbus/display on patch8,
> there are possible multiple cases with various devfreq governor
> which is changed on the runtime by user through sysfs interface.
>
> If users changes the devfreq governor as following:
> Before,
> - bus_dmc (simple_ondemand, available frequency 100/200/300/400 MHz)
> --> bus_leftbus(simple_ondemand, available frequency 100/200/300/400 MHz)
> ----> bus_display(passive)
>
> After changed governor of bus_dmc,
> if the min_freq by interconnect requirement is 400Mhz,
> - bus_dmc (powersave) : min_freq and max_freq and cur_freq is 100MHz
> --> bus_leftbus(simple_ondemand) : cur_freq is 400Mhz
> ----> bus_display(passive)
>
> The final frequency is 400MHz of bus_dmc
> even if the min_freq/max_freq/cur_freq is 100MHz.
> It cannot show the correct min_freq/max_freq through
> devfreq sysfs interface.
>
>
> 2. When disabling the some frequency by devfreq-thermal throttling,
> This patch checks the min_freq of interconnect requirement
> in the exynos_bus_target() and exynos_bus_passive_target().
> Also, it cannot show the correct min_freq/max_freq through
> devfreq sysfs interface.
>
> For example of bus_dmc bus,
> - The available frequencies are 100MHz, 200MHz, 300MHz, 400MHz
> - Disable 400MHz by devfreq-thermal throttling
> - min_freq is 100MHz
> - max_freq is 300MHz
> - min_freq of interconnect is 400MHz
>
> In result, the final frequency is 400MHz by exynos_bus_target()
> There are no problem for working. But, the user cannot know
> reason why cur_freq is 400MHz even if max_freq is 300MHz.
>
> Basically, update_devfreq() considers the all constraints
> of min_freq/max_freq to decide the proper target frequency.
>
>
> 3.
> I think that the exynos_bus_passive_target() is used for devfreq device
> using 'passive' governor. The frequency already depends on the parent device.
>
> If already the parent devfreq device like bus_leftbus consider
> the minimum frequency of QoS requirement like interconnect,
> it is not necessary. The next frequency of devfreq device
> with 'passive' governor, it will apply the QoS requirement
> without any additional code.
>
> >
> > Please note that it is not an error when CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is 'n', in
> > which case all interconnect API functions are no-op.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Artur Świgoń <a.swigon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 145 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > index 412511ca7703..12fb7c84ae50 100644
> > --- a/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/exynos-bus.c
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> > #include <linux/devfreq-event.h>
> > #include <linux/device.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > +#include <linux/interconnect-provider.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > #include <linux/pm_opp.h>
> > @@ -23,6 +24,8 @@
> > #define DEFAULT_SATURATION_RATIO 40
> > #define DEFAULT_VOLTAGE_TOLERANCE 2
> >
> > +#define icc_units_to_hz(x) ((x) * 1000UL / 8)
> > +
> > struct exynos_bus {
> > struct device *dev;
> >
> > @@ -31,12 +34,17 @@ struct exynos_bus {
> > unsigned int edev_count;
> > struct mutex lock;
> >
> > + unsigned long min_freq;
> > unsigned long curr_freq;
> >
> > struct regulator *regulator;
> > struct clk *clk;
> > unsigned int voltage_tolerance;
> > unsigned int ratio;
> > +
> > + /* One provider per bus, one node per provider */
> > + struct icc_provider provider;
> > + struct icc_node *node;
> > };
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -61,6 +69,13 @@ exynos_bus_ops_edev(enable_edev);
> > exynos_bus_ops_edev(disable_edev);
> > exynos_bus_ops_edev(set_event);
> >
> > +static int exynos_bus_next_id(void)
> > +{
> > + static int exynos_bus_node_id;
> > +
> > + return exynos_bus_node_id++;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int exynos_bus_get_event(struct exynos_bus *bus,
> > struct devfreq_event_data *edata)
> > {
> > @@ -98,6 +113,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_target(struct device *dev, unsigned
> > long *freq, u32 flags)
> > unsigned long old_freq, new_freq, new_volt, tol;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + *freq = max(*freq, bus->min_freq);
> > +
> > /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
> > new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
> > if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
> > @@ -208,6 +225,8 @@ static int exynos_bus_passive_target(struct device *dev,
> > unsigned long *freq,
> > unsigned long old_freq, new_freq;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > + *freq = max(*freq, bus->min_freq);
> > +
> > /* Get new opp-bus instance according to new bus clock */
> > new_opp = devfreq_recommended_opp(dev, freq, flags);
> > if (IS_ERR(new_opp)) {
> > @@ -251,6 +270,35 @@ static void exynos_bus_passive_exit(struct device *dev)
> > clk_disable_unprepare(bus->clk);
> > }
> >
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_set(struct icc_node *src, struct icc_node *dst)
> > +{
> > + struct exynos_bus *src_bus = src->data, *dst_bus = dst->data;
> > +
> > + src_bus->min_freq = icc_units_to_hz(src->peak_bw);
> > + dst_bus->min_freq = icc_units_to_hz(dst->peak_bw);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_aggregate(struct icc_node *node, u32 avg_bw,
> > + u32 peak_bw, u32 *agg_avg, u32 *agg_peak)
> > +{
> > + *agg_peak = *agg_avg = peak_bw;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct icc_node *exynos_bus_icc_xlate(struct of_phandle_args *spec,
> > + void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct exynos_bus *bus = data;
> > +
> > + if (spec->np != bus->dev->of_node)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + return bus->node;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int exynos_bus_parent_parse_of(struct device_node *np,
> > struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > {
> > @@ -469,6 +517,95 @@ static int exynos_bus_profile_init_passive(struct
> > exynos_bus *bus,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_connect(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np = bus->dev->of_node;
> > + struct devfreq *parent_devfreq;
> > + struct icc_node *parent_node = NULL;
> > + struct of_phandle_args args;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + parent_devfreq = devfreq_get_devfreq_by_phandle(bus->dev, 0);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(parent_devfreq)) {
> > + struct exynos_bus *parent_bus;
> > +
> > + parent_bus = dev_get_drvdata(parent_devfreq->dev.parent);
> > + parent_node = parent_bus->node;
> > + } else {
> > + /* Look for parent in DT */
> > + int num = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > + "#interconnect-cells");
> > + if (num != 1)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "parent",
> > + "#interconnect-cells",
> > + 0, &args);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + of_node_put(args.np);
> > +
> > + parent_node = of_icc_get_from_provider(&args);
> > + if (IS_ERR(parent_node)) {
> > + /* May be -EPROBE_DEFER */
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(parent_node);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = icc_link_create(bus->node, parent_node->id);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int exynos_bus_icc_init(struct exynos_bus *bus)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = bus->dev;
> > + struct icc_provider *provider = &bus->provider;
> > + struct icc_node *node;
> > + int id, ret;
> > +
> > + /* Initialize the interconnect provider */
> > + provider->set = exynos_bus_icc_set;
> > + provider->aggregate = exynos_bus_icc_aggregate;
> > + provider->xlate = exynos_bus_icc_xlate;
> > + provider->dev = dev;
> > + provider->data = bus;
> > +
> > + ret = icc_provider_add(provider);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto out;
> > +
> > + id = exynos_bus_next_id();
> > + node = icc_node_create(id);
> > + if (IS_ERR(node)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(node);
> > + goto err_node;
> > + }
> > +
> > + bus->node = node;
> > + node->name = dev->of_node->name;
> > + node->data = bus;
> > + icc_node_add(node, provider);
> > +
> > + ret = exynos_bus_icc_connect(bus);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto err_connect;
> > +
> > +out:
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +err_connect:
> > + icc_node_del(node);
> > + icc_node_destroy(id);
> > +err_node:
> > + icc_provider_del(provider);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > @@ -517,6 +654,14 @@ static int exynos_bus_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > goto err;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Initialize interconnect provider. A return value of -ENOTSUPP means
> > + * that CONFIG_INTERCONNECT is disabled.
> > + */
> > + ret = exynos_bus_icc_init(bus);
> > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTSUPP)
> > + goto err;
> > +
> > max_state = bus->devfreq->profile->max_state;
> > min_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[0] / 1000);
> > max_freq = (bus->devfreq->profile->freq_table[max_state - 1] / 1000);
> >
>
>
--
Artur Świgoń
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
