Re: [PATCH 0/5] drm-misc-next: Revert patches missing reviews

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 15:21, Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hellooo,
> This has been covered ad nauseam on the m-l and irc, but for the record:
>
> Reviews are a mandatory requirement for patches in drm-misc-next, it's
> what keeps us all honest in the committer model. The most recent
> drm-misc-next pull included a handful of patches that were missing
> reviews. There was absolutely zero nefarious intent, but rules are
> rules, so we're reverting them.
>
> I feel confident re-applying all of these with my SoB, so I plan on
> doing that in the same push.
>
Thanks.

> Thanks to everyone for handling this so well, seriously awesome that
> we can stay constructive as a community \o/.
>
> Lastly, this will be caught by our tooling in the future so this should
> be the last time this happens (on accident).
>
Hear, hear.

> Sean
>
> Sean Paul (5):

>   Revert "drm/vgem: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"
>   Revert "drm/msm: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"
>   Revert "drm/nouveau: remove open-coded drm_invalid_op()"
>
For these three:
Acked-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux