Hi Rong Am 06.08.19 um 14:59 schrieb Chen, Rong A: > Hi, > > On 8/5/2019 6:25 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >> Hi >> >> Am 05.08.19 um 09:28 schrieb Rong Chen: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 8/5/19 3:02 PM, Feng Tang wrote: >>>> Hi Thomas, >>>> >>>> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:39:19PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> I did some further analysis on this problem and found that the blinking >>>>> cursor affects performance of the vm-scalability test case. >>>>> >>>>> I only have a 4-core machine, so scalability is not really testable. Yet >>>>> I see the effects of running vm-scalibility against drm-tip, a revert of >>>>> the mgag200 patch and the vmap fixes that I posted a few days ago. >>>>> >>>>> After reverting the mgag200 patch, running the test as described in the >>>>> report >>>>> >>>>> bin/lkp run job.yaml >>>>> >>>>> gives results like >>>>> >>>>> 2019-08-02 19:34:37 ./case-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb >>>>> 2019-08-02 19:34:37 ./usemem --runtime 300 -n 4 --prealloc >>>>> --prefault >>>>> -O -U 815395225 >>>>> 917319627 bytes / 756534 usecs = 1184110 KB/s >>>>> 917319627 bytes / 764675 usecs = 1171504 KB/s >>>>> 917319627 bytes / 766414 usecs = 1168846 KB/s >>>>> 917319627 bytes / 777990 usecs = 1151454 KB/s >>>>> >>>>> Running the test against current drm-tip gives slightly worse results, >>>>> such as. >>>>> >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:17:06 ./case-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:17:06 ./usemem --runtime 300 -n 4 --prealloc >>>>> --prefault >>>>> -O -U 815394406 >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 871607 usecs = 1027778 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 894173 usecs = 1001840 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 919694 usecs = 974040 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 923341 usecs = 970193 KB/s >>>>> >>>>> The test puts out roughly one result per second. Strangely sending the >>>>> output to /dev/null can make results significantly worse. >>>>> >>>>> bin/lkp run job.yaml > /dev/null >>>>> >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:23:04 ./case-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:23:04 ./usemem --runtime 300 -n 4 --prealloc >>>>> --prefault >>>>> -O -U 815394406 >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 1207358 usecs = 741966 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 1210456 usecs = 740067 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 1216572 usecs = 736346 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 1239152 usecs = 722929 KB/s >>>>> >>>>> I realized that there's still a blinking cursor on the screen, which I >>>>> disabled with >>>>> >>>>> tput civis >>>>> >>>>> or alternatively >>>>> >>>>> echo 0 > /sys/devices/virtual/graphics/fbcon/cursor_blink >>>>> >>>>> Running the the test now gives the original or even better results, >>>>> such as >>>>> >>>>> bin/lkp run job.yaml > /dev/null >>>>> >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:29:17 ./case-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb >>>>> 2019-08-03 19:29:17 ./usemem --runtime 300 -n 4 --prealloc >>>>> --prefault >>>>> -O -U 815394406 >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 659419 usecs = 1358497 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 659658 usecs = 1358005 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 659916 usecs = 1357474 KB/s >>>>> 917318700 bytes / 660168 usecs = 1356956 KB/s >>>>> >>>>> Rong, Feng, could you confirm this by disabling the cursor or blinking? >>>> Glad to know this method restored the drop. Rong is running the case. >>> I set "echo 0 > /sys/devices/virtual/graphics/fbcon/cursor_blink" for >>> both commits, >>> and the regression has no obvious change. >> Ah, I see. Thank you for testing. There are two questions that come to >> my mind: did you send the regular output to /dev/null? And what happens >> if you disable the cursor with 'tput civis'? > > I didn't send the output to /dev/null because we need to collect data > from the output, You can send it to any file, as long as it doesn't show up on the console. I also found the latest results in the file result/vm-scalability. > Actually we run the benchmark as a background process, do we need to > disable the cursor and test again? There's a worker thread that updates the display from the shadow buffer. The blinking cursor periodically triggers the worker thread, but the actual update is just the size of one character. The point of the test without output is to see if the regression comes from the buffer update (i.e., the memcpy from shadow buffer to VRAM), or from the worker thread. If the regression goes away after disabling the blinking cursor, then the worker thread is the problem. If it already goes away if there's simply no output from the test, the screen update is the problem. On my machine I have to disable the blinking cursor, so I think the worker causes the performance drop. Best regards Thomas > > Best Regards, > Rong Chen > >> If there is absolutely nothing changing on the screen, I don't see how >> the regression could persist. >> >> Best regards >> Thomas >> >> >>> commit: >>> f1f8555dfb9 drm/bochs: Use shadow buffer for bochs framebuffer console >>> 90f479ae51a drm/mgag200: Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic >>> framebuffer emulation >>> >>> f1f8555dfb9a70a2 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde testcase/testparams/testbox >>> ---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------- >>> %stddev change %stddev >>> \ | \ >>> 43394 -20% 34575 ± 3% >>> vm-scalability/performance-300s-8T-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb/lkp-knm01 >>> 43393 -20% 34575 GEO-MEAN >>> vm-scalability.median >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Rong Chen >>> >>>> While I have another finds, as I noticed your patch changed the bpp from >>>> 24 to 32, I had a patch to change it back to 24, and run the case in >>>> the weekend, the -18% regrssion was reduced to about -5%. Could this >>>> be related? >>>> >>>> commit: >>>> f1f8555dfb9 drm/bochs: Use shadow buffer for bochs framebuffer console >>>> 90f479ae51a drm/mgag200: Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic >>>> framebuffer emulation >>>> 01e75fea0d5 mgag200: restore the depth back to 24 >>>> >>>> f1f8555dfb9a70a2 90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde9 01e75fea0d5ff39d3e588c20ec5 >>>> ---------------- --------------------------- --------------------------- >>>> 43921 ± 2% -18.3% 35884 -4.8% >>>> 41826 vm-scalability.median >>>> 14889337 -17.5% 12291029 -4.1% >>>> 14278574 vm-scalability.throughput >>>> commit 01e75fea0d5ff39d3e588c20ec52e7a4e6588a74 >>>> Author: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Date: Fri Aug 2 15:09:19 2019 +0800 >>>> >>>> mgag200: restore the depth back to 24 >>>> Signed-off-by: Feng Tang <feng.tang@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c >>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c >>>> index a977333..ac8f6c9 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c >>>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int mgag200_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, >>>> unsigned long flags) >>>> if (IS_G200_SE(mdev) && mdev->mc.vram_size < (2048*1024)) >>>> dev->mode_config.preferred_depth = 16; >>>> else >>>> - dev->mode_config.preferred_depth = 32; >>>> + dev->mode_config.preferred_depth = 24; >>>> dev->mode_config.prefer_shadow = 1; >>>> r = mgag200_modeset_init(mdev); >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Feng >>>> >>>>> The difference between mgag200's original fbdev support and generic >>>>> fbdev emulation is generic fbdev's worker task that updates the VRAM >>>>> buffer from the shadow buffer. mgag200 does this immediately, but relies >>>>> on drm_can_sleep(), which is deprecated. >>>>> >>>>> I think that the worker task interferes with the test case, as the >>>>> worker has been in fbdev emulation since forever and no performance >>>>> regressions have been reported so far. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> So unless there's a report where this problem happens in a real-world >>>>> use case, I'd like to keep code as it is. And apparently there's always >>>>> the workaround of disabling the cursor blinking. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Thomas >>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LKP mailing list >> LKP@xxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/lkp > -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstrasse 5, 90409 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
