On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 1:28 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This file isn't using any interfaces from <linux/gpio.h> so > > just drop the include. > > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > So what do I do with these simple patches as noone seems to > ACK or review them for a month? Ping people explicitly for review/acks, either here or on irc. Keep a record of who owes you, to make your ping convincing :-) > I guess as last resort simply apply them to the GPIO tree, but > hey. The trouble is that with mailing lists it's essentially impossible to track patches in need of review. Except if everyone would keep their own stuff up to date, which almost noone does (plus you'd need to do it on all the disjoint patchwork instances if you cc multiple list). So defacto stuff just gets lost after about a week or so, and you need to kick it again. "Maintainer updates patchwork all the time" doesn't scale and leads to burnout. It sucks, but it is what it is. Waiting a full month is definitely too much waiting, especially for a simple patch like this one. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
