From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or release_pages(). This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in commit fc1d8e7cca2d ("mm: introduce put_user_page*(), placeholder versions"). Note that this effectively changes the code's behavior in qp_release_pages(): it now ultimately calls set_page_dirty_lock(), instead of set_page_dirty(). This is probably more accurate. As Christophe Hellwig put it, "set_page_dirty() is only safe if we are dealing with a file backed page where we have reference on the inode it hangs off." [1] [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723153640.GB720@xxxxxx Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Roman Kiryanov <rkir@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c b/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c index cef0133aa47a..2bd21020e288 100644 --- a/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c +++ b/drivers/platform/goldfish/goldfish_pipe.c @@ -288,15 +288,12 @@ static int pin_user_pages(unsigned long first_page, static void release_user_pages(struct page **pages, int pages_count, int is_write, s32 consumed_size) { - int i; + bool dirty = !is_write && consumed_size > 0; - for (i = 0; i < pages_count; i++) { - if (!is_write && consumed_size > 0) - set_page_dirty(pages[i]); - put_page(pages[i]); - } + put_user_pages_dirty_lock(pages, pages_count, dirty); } + /* Populate the call parameters, merging adjacent pages together */ static void populate_rw_params(struct page **pages, int pages_count, -- 2.22.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel