Hi Andrej. On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 02:44:50PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > Hi Sam, > > W dniu 23.07.2019 o 11:05, Sam Ravnborg pisze: > > Hi Andrzej > > > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 01:26:41PM +0200, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: > > > Use the ddc pointer provided by the generic connector. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.c | 1 + > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.c > > > index 62d014c20988..c373edb95666 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.c > > > @@ -219,6 +219,7 @@ static struct drm_connector *tfp410_connector_create(struct drm_device *dev, > > > tfp410_connector->mod = mod; > > > connector = &tfp410_connector->base; > > > + connector->ddc = mod->i2c; > > > drm_connector_init(dev, connector, &tfp410_connector_funcs, > > > DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVID); > > > > When reading this code, it looks strange that we set connector->ddc > > *before* the call to init the connector. > > One could risk that drm_connector_init() used memset(..) to clear all > > fields or so, and it would break this order. > > I verified the code of drm_connector_init() and cannot find any memset() > invocations there. What is your actual concern? My concern is that drm_connector_init() maybe sometime in the future will init all fileds in drm_connector, so we loose any assingments done to drm_connector from *before* we called the init function. Moving the assignment to after drm_connector_init() would not let us depend on the actual implmentation of drm_connector_init(). Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
