On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 at 09:14, Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > A fair bit of the complexity of kbase comes from trying to avoid the > > possibility of one process DoSing another by submitting malicious jobs. > > ...and yet it was still doable so easily (by accident, with buggy jobs > instead of malicious jobs).... sigh... > > Still is on the mainline kernel (e.g. running dEQP in a window in > Weston, some faults triggered in dEQP end up messing up Weston's > rendering outside the deqp window). What's our threat model here? > > Is "banning WebGL on Panfrost" allowed? :) I think what Panfrost needs to do is to give browsers as much support as possible to make WebGL secure. This includes making best use of the HW to that end, and implementing any robustness-related extensions that may be available. Cheers, Tomeu _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
