On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 12:17 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu 13-06-19 11:43:08, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > noveau is currently using this through an odd hmm wrapper, and I plan > > to switch it to the real thing later in this series. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > --- > > mm/mempolicy.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c > > index 01600d80ae01..f9023b5fba37 100644 > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > > @@ -2098,6 +2098,7 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma, > > out: > > return page; > > } > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(alloc_pages_vma); > > All allocator exported symbols are EXPORT_SYMBOL, what is a reason to > have this one special? I asked for this simply because it was not exported historically. In general I want to establish explicit export-type criteria so the community can spend less time debating when to use EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL [1]. The thought in this instance is that it is not historically exported to modules and it is safer from a maintenance perspective to start with GPL-only for new symbols in case we don't want to maintain that interface long-term for out-of-tree modules. Yes, we always reserve the right to remove / change interfaces regardless of the export type, but history has shown that external pressure to keep an interface stable (contrary to Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst) tends to be less for GPL-only exports. [1]: https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2018-September/005688.html _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
