Quoting Iurii Zaikin (2019-06-05 18:29:42) > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:22 AM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-05-14 15:17:10) > > > diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000000000..fe0f2bae66085 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c > > > + > > > + > > > +static void sysctl_test_dointvec_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test) > > > +{ > > > + struct ctl_table table = { > > > + .procname = "foo", > > > + .data = &test_data.int_0001, > > > + .maxlen = sizeof(int), > > > + .mode = 0644, > > > + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec, > > > + .extra1 = &i_zero, > > > + .extra2 = &i_one_hundred, > > > + }; > > > + char input[] = "-9"; > > > + size_t len = sizeof(input) - 1; > > > + loff_t pos = 0; > > > + > > > + table.data = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(int), GFP_USER); > > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, 1, input, &len, &pos)); > > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len); > > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos); > > > + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -9, *(int *)table.data); > > > > Is the casting necessary? Or can the macro do a type coercion of the > > second parameter based on the first type? > Data field is defined as void* so I believe casting is necessary to > dereference it as a pointer to an array of ints. I don't think the > macro should do any type coercion that == operator wouldn't do. > I did change the cast to make it more clear that it's a pointer to an > array of ints being dereferenced. Ok, I still wonder if we should make KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ check the types on both sides and cause a build warning/error if the types aren't the same. This would be similar to our min/max macros that complain about mismatched types in the comparisons. Then if a test developer needs to convert one type or the other they could do so with a KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_T() macro that lists the types to coerce both sides to explicitly. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel