On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 23:29 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 01:07:49PM -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > The Write_Status_Update_Request I2C transaction requires the MOT
> > bit to
> > be set, Change the logical AND to OR to fix what looks like a typo.
>
> It's not a type. We're just preserving MOT. What makes you think it
> should always be set?
>
The table defining request commands (2-148) has the MOT bit set for
Write_Status_Update_Request, doesn't make it look like an option when
querying the status. Checking the callers again, I see that we could
get a defer when ending an i2c transaction and that will require a
Write_Status_Update_Request with MOT unset. Sorry for the noise.
> >
> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Fixes: 68ec2a2a2481 ("drm/dp: Use I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE to drain
> > partial I2C_WRITE requests")
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 2d6c491a0542..d98805b517f0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void
> > drm_dp_i2c_msg_write_status_update(struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> > * rest of the message
> > */
> > if ((msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) == DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE) {
> > - msg->request &= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> > + msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_MOT;
> > msg->request |= DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE;
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
