Hi,
Le vendredi 23 mars 2018 à 11:06 +0100, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 04:28:59PM +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> > In order to check whether the frontend supports a specific format, an
> > explicit list and a related helper are introduced.
> >
> > They are then used to determine whether the frontend can actually support
> > the requested format when it was selected to be used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c | 5 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_frontend.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_frontend.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > index 7703ba989743..1fad0714c70e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_backend.c
> > @@ -532,6 +532,11 @@ static int sun4i_backend_atomic_check(struct sunxi_engine *engine,
> > struct drm_format_name_buf format_name;
> >
> > if (sun4i_backend_plane_uses_frontend(plane_state)) {
> > + if (!sun4i_frontend_format_is_supported(fb->format->format)) {
> > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Frontend plane check failed\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
>
> So you're checking if the frontend doesn't support it and if the
> backend doesn't support it. Who supports it then? :)
>
> Like I was saying, this should be moved to the previous patch, within
> sun4i_backend_plane_uses_frontend.
You're right, this isn't the right place to put it.
sun4i_backend_plane_uses_frontend should definitely guarantee that the
format is supported.
> > +static const uint32_t sun4i_frontend_formats[] = {
> > + /* RGB */
> > + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_BGRX8888,
> > + /* YUV444 */
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YUV444,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVU444,
> > + /* YUV422 */
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YUYV,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVYU,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_UYVY,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_VYUY,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_NV16,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_NV61,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YUV422,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVU422,
> > + /* YUV420 */
> > + DRM_FORMAT_NV12,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_NV21,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YUV420,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVU420,
> > + /* YUV411 */
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YUV411,
> > + DRM_FORMAT_YVU411,
> > +};
>
> I think this list should reflect what the driver currently supports,
> not what the hardware supports.
Agreed, this should be updated with the follow-up patch that adds YUV
support.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
