On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 1:41 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I've seen that you dropped this patch: >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10445393/ >> >> Is that patch correct or incorrect? In case it is incorrect, do you have >> an idea how should fbdefio be used properly on KMS drivers? > > I suppose I was wondering what use fbdefio really has, modern code > should be using KMS interface and the KMS dirty handling should be > able to cover those cases. > > I don't really like the maintainability decrease moving to in-driver > page handling causes vs using shmem. I think tinydrm has the same problem of shmem+fbdefio, could be worth it to chat with Noralf. Adding him. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
