> > I've seen that you dropped this patch: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10445393/ > > Is that patch correct or incorrect? In case it is incorrect, do you have > an idea how should fbdefio be used properly on KMS drivers? I suppose I was wondering what use fbdefio really has, modern code should be using KMS interface and the KMS dirty handling should be able to cover those cases. I don't really like the maintainability decrease moving to in-driver page handling causes vs using shmem. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
