Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Add mystery delay to enable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Sun, Aug 26, 2018, 1:44 AM <spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2018-08-23 19:55, Sean Paul wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:01:45AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 10:00:33AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 04:59:31PM +0530, spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > > On 2018-08-14 03:00, Sean Paul wrote:
>> > > > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > >
>> > > > This patch adds a 70ms mystery delay to the bridge driver in enable.
>> > > > By experimentation, it seems like it can go anywhere up until we
>> > > > initiate semi-auto link training. If we don't have the delay, link
>> > > > training fails.
>> > > >
>> > > > I tried to root cause this as best I could, but neither the datasheet
>> > > > for the panel nor the bridge mention a delay of this magnitude in their
>> > > > timing requirements. So for now, add the mystery delay until someone
>> > > > figures out a better fix.
>> > > >
>> > > > Changes in v3:
>> > > > - Added to the set
>> > > >
>> > > > Cc: Sandeep Panda <spanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > ---
>> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 12 ++++++++++++
>> > > >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>> > > >
>> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>> > > > index d3e27e52ea759..f8a931cf3665e 100644
>> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
>> > > > @@ -458,6 +458,18 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge
>> > > > *bridge)
>> > > >        unsigned int val;
>> > > >        int ret;
>> > > >
>> > > > +      /*
>> > > > +       * FIXME:
>> > > > +       * This 70ms was found necessary by experimentation. If it's not
>> > > > +       * present, link training fails. It seems like it can go anywhere from
>> > > > +       * pre_enable() up to semi-auto link training initiation below.
>> > > > +       *
>> > > > +       * Neither the datasheet for the bridge nor the panel tested mention a
>> > > > +       * delay of this magnitude in the timing requirements. So for now, add
>> > > > +       * the mystery delay until someone figures out a better fix.
>> > > > +       */
>> > >
>> > > Is this newly found issue? Specific to any board config?
>> >
>> > It's specific to cheza.
>>
>> Well, I suppose I shouldn't say that since I've not tried the bridge
>> on another
>> board. I should say, it reproduces on cheza.
>
> Ping. Sandeep: any more feedback?
>
> Sean
>
>>
>> Sean
>>
>> > This was found with swboyd changed the panel regulator
>> > from always-on/boot-on to toggle.
>> >
>> > I've pushed the tag "mtp-testing-0813" to dpu-staging so you can play around
>> > with it. Without this delay, link training fails.
>> >
>> > Sean
>> >
>> > >
>> > > > +      msleep(70);
>> > > > +
>> > > >        /* DSI_A lane config */
>> > > >        val = CHA_DSI_LANES(4 - pdata->dsi->lanes);
>> > > >        regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG,
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS
>>
>> --
>> Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS

No more comments from my side.

So, should I find another reviewer? 

Sean


Sandeep
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux