Clarification question - if the run queues belong to different
schedulers they effectively point to different rings,
it means we allow to move (reschedule) a drm_sched_entity from one ring
to another - i assume that the idea int the first place, that
you have a set of HW rings and you can utilize any of them for your jobs
(like compute rings). Correct ?
Andrey
On 08/01/2018 04:20 AM, Nayan Deshmukh wrote:
The function selects the run queue from the rq_list with the
least load. The load is decided by the number of jobs in a
scheduler.
v2: avoid using atomic read twice consecutively, instead store
it locally
Signed-off-by: Nayan Deshmukh <nayan26deshmukh@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
index 375f6f7f6a93..fb4e542660b0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/gpu_scheduler.c
@@ -255,6 +255,31 @@ static bool drm_sched_entity_is_ready(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
return true;
}
+/**
+ * drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched - Get the rq from rq_list with least load
+ *
+ * @entity: scheduler entity
+ *
+ * Return the pointer to the rq with least load.
+ */
+static struct drm_sched_rq *
+drm_sched_entity_get_free_sched(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
+{
+ struct drm_sched_rq *rq = NULL;
+ unsigned int min_jobs = UINT_MAX, num_jobs;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < entity->num_rq_list; ++i) {
+ num_jobs = atomic_read(&entity->rq_list[i]->sched->num_jobs);
+ if (num_jobs < min_jobs) {
+ min_jobs = num_jobs;
+ rq = entity->rq_list[i];
+ }
+ }
+
+ return rq;
+}
+
static void drm_sched_entity_kill_jobs_cb(struct dma_fence *f,
struct dma_fence_cb *cb)
{
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
