On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I suppose we probably shouldn't worry about current_time being greater than
> INT64_MAX? I guess if that happens we have pretty big problems...
Nope, we've already given up on that working -- it's a couple hundred
years of system uptime. Neither of us have any concerns in this area.
>> timeout = MIN2(max_timeout, timeout);
>>
>> return (current_time + timeout);
>> }
>>
>
> Yeah, I think that's better.
Cool. I'll wait for further review :-)
I don't think I have any more comments on this patch. It's gross but I think it should work.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
