Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I suppose we probably shouldn't worry about current_time being greater than > INT64_MAX? I guess if that happens we have pretty big problems... Nope, we've already given up on that working -- it's a couple hundred years of system uptime. Neither of us have any concerns in this area. >> timeout = MIN2(max_timeout, timeout); >> >> return (current_time + timeout); >> } >> > > Yeah, I think that's better. Cool. I'll wait for further review :-) -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
