Looks like a good idea to me as well. Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> for the series.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 11.05.2018 um 07:27 schrieb Zhou, David(ChunMing):
The series is OK to me, Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx>
It is better to wait Christian to have a look before pushing patch.
Regards,
David Zhou
-----Original Message-----
From: Junwei Zhang [mailto:Jerry.Zhang@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 12:58 PM
To: amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; Zhou, David(ChunMing) <David1.Zhou@xxxxxxx>; Zhang, Jerry <Jerry.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: set ttm bo priority before initialization
Signed-off-by: Junwei Zhang <Jerry.Zhang@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index e62153a..6a9e46a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_do_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
bo->tbo.bdev = &adev->mman.bdev;
amdgpu_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, bp->domain);
+ if (bp->type == ttm_bo_type_kernel)
+ bo->tbo.priority = 1;
r = ttm_bo_init_reserved(&adev->mman.bdev, &bo->tbo, size, bp->type,
&bo->placement, page_align, &ctx, acc_size, @@ -434,9 +436,6 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_do_create(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
else
amdgpu_cs_report_moved_bytes(adev, ctx.bytes_moved, 0);
- if (bp->type == ttm_bo_type_kernel)
- bo->tbo.priority = 1;
-
if (bp->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_CLEARED &&
bo->tbo.mem.placement & TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM) {
struct dma_fence *fence;
--
1.9.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
