> On May 8, 2018, at 11:52 PM, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:46:20AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >>> >>> Thank you for the awesome summary, it is very helpful! So since the boilerplate >>> has to stay, is there a benefit to adding the SPDX header? Is it just to make >>> scripting/scraping easier? >> >> Actually, the header now adds the correct information. Without the header >> it is not clear that these files are supposed to be dual licensed under >> MIT or GPL-2. >> > > Should these (or any of the drm drivers for that matter) be dual > licensed or just MIT? The code is MIT. I can't speak for the copyright owners for other files - where VMware holds copyright our intent is to have this be dual licensed MIT or GPL-2.0 /D _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
