On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Dirk Hohndel <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:46:20AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote: >> >> Thank you for the awesome summary, it is very helpful! So since the boilerplate >> has to stay, is there a benefit to adding the SPDX header? Is it just to make >> scripting/scraping easier? > > Actually, the header now adds the correct information. Without the header > it is not clear that these files are supposed to be dual licensed under > MIT or GPL-2. > Should these (or any of the drm drivers for that matter) be dual licensed or just MIT? The code is MIT. Alex > And yes, it of course simplifies tooling as well, which is why there is a > push to get these headers broadly added to many open source projects. > > /D > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
