On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:46:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Quoting Sandeep Panda (2018-04-19 10:56:06) > >> Document the bindings used for the sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge. > >> > >> Changes in v1: > >> - Rephrase the dt-binding descriptions to be more inline with existing > >> bindings (Andrzej Hajda). > >> - Add missing dt-binding that are parsed by corresponding driver > >> (Andrzej Hajda). > >> > >> Changes in v2: > >> - Removed edp panel specific dt-binding entries. Only keep bridge > >> specific entries (Sean Paul). > >> - Remove custom-modes dt entry since its usage is removed from driver also (Sean Paul). > >> - Remove is-pluggable dt entry since this will not be needed anymore (Sean Paul). > >> > >> Changes in v3: > >> - Removed irq-gpio dt entry and instead populate is an interrupt > >> property (Rob Herring). > > > > These changelogs usually go below the triple dash, but maybe drm is > > different and wants them? > > yeah, drm generally wants them in the commit msg rather than below the > triple-dash, although I guess for bindings docs it should follow the > rules for that tree.. I usually just fix up these sort of things as I > apply patches, but not sure what other maintainers prefer Well, these DPU patches aren't targeted for upstream so who cares. Many patch revision changelogs I see are crap with statements like "implement changes requested by ??". But in this case, the changelog is really good. Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
