Hello, On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:02:08PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Il 19/04/2018 15:36, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto: > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 9:34 PM, Ondřej Jirman > > <doudahwezomiechahtah@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello Giulio, > > > > > > this patch breaks LVDS output on A83T. Without it, modesetting works, > > > with it there's no output. > > > > > > Some more info below... > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 12:20:19PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote: > > > > mode_valid function is missing for lvds. > > > > > > > > Add it making it pointed by encoder helper functions. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > index be3f14d..bffff4c 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c > > > > @@ -94,9 +94,64 @@ static void sun4i_lvds_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder) > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static enum drm_mode_status sun4i_lvds_encoder_mode_valid(struct drm_encoder *crtc, > > > > + const struct drm_display_mode *mode) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct sun4i_lvds *lvds = drm_encoder_to_sun4i_lvds(crtc); > > > > + struct sun4i_tcon *tcon = lvds->tcon; > > > > + u32 hsync = mode->hsync_end - mode->hsync_start; > > > > + u32 vsync = mode->vsync_end - mode->vsync_start; > > > > + unsigned long rate = mode->clock * 1000; > > > > + long rounded_rate; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Validating modes...\n"); > > > > + > > > > + if (hsync < 1) > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_NARROW; > > > > + > > > > + if (hsync > 0x3ff) > > > > + return MODE_HSYNC_WIDE; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay < 1) || (mode->htotal < 1)) > > > > + return MODE_H_ILLEGAL; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->hdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->htotal > 0xfff)) > > > > + return MODE_BAD_HVALUE; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Horizontal parameters OK\n"); > > > > + > > > > + if (vsync < 1) > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_NARROW; > > > > + > > > > + if (vsync > 0x3ff) > > > > + return MODE_VSYNC_WIDE; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay < 1) || (mode->vtotal < 1)) > > > > + return MODE_V_ILLEGAL; > > > > + > > > > + if ((mode->vdisplay > 0x7ff) || (mode->vtotal > 0xfff)) > > > > + return MODE_BAD_VVALUE; > > > > + > > > > + DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Vertical parameters OK\n"); > > > > + > > > > + tcon->dclk_min_div = 7; > > > > + tcon->dclk_max_div = 7; > > > > > > Why would validation function change any state anywhere? > > > > > > > + rounded_rate = clk_round_rate(tcon->dclk, rate); > > > > > > The issue is here, on A83T TBS A711 tablet, I get... > > > > > > sun4i-tcon 1c0c000.lcd-controller: XXX: hsync=20 hdisplay=1024 htotal=1384 > > > vsync=5 vdisplay=600 vtotal=640 rate=52000000 rounded_rate=51857142 > > > > > > > + if (rounded_rate < rate) > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_LOW; > > > > + > > > > + if (rounded_rate > rate) > > > > + return MODE_CLOCK_HIGH; > > > > > > ... while the previous conditions require an exact match for some reason. > > > > > > But HW works fine without an exact rate match. Why is exact match required here? > > > > This thread might provide some more info, though we could never get an > > agreement. > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9446385/ > > Thanks for pointing that Thread ChenYu. > So the only chance is to trim frequency according to encoder capabilities. > I agree to block when encoder can't provide frequency specified, > otherwise you could drive you panel at the near the lowest(highest) > frequency and get out of limits for a few without knowing it. When I set the range of pixel clock frequencies on simple-panel connected to this encoder, the check still fails, so there's something not working there as expected. This check is only called once with a typical frequency. I guess drm doesn't implement clock-frequency range on panels. But I haven't looked. I can set the exact frequency that the SoC can provide on the simple-panel, but that's a bit of a hack. regards, o. > Best regards > > -- > Giulio Benetti _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel