On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:49:42PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-04-20 12:41, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > I love your patch! Yet something to improve: > > Yup, right you are! > > > [auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc1 next-20180420] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Rosin/Add-tda998x-HDMI-support-to-atmel-hlcdc/20180420-160131 > > base: git://people.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux.git drm-next > > config: i386-randconfig-a0-201815 (attached as .config) > > compiler: gcc-4.9 (Debian 4.9.4-2) 4.9.4 > > reproduce: > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > > make ARCH=i386 > > > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c: In function 'tda998x_probe': > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c:1859:16: error: 'struct drm_bridge' has no member named 'of_node' > > bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node; > > ^ > > Anybody got a better fix than this? > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF > bridge->bridge.of_node = dev->of_node; > #endif How about the bridge code provides a helper to do this, something like: static inline void bridge_set_device(struct drm_bridge *bridge, struct device *dev) { #ifdef CONFIG_OF bridge->of_node = dev->of_node; #endif } which (a) nicely hides the firmware flavour, and (b) hides the ifdef in the bridge header where it belongs. If the bridge code needs to be converted to fwnode in the future, at least this would be abstracted from the drivers. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
