Comment # 4
on bug 104660
from Alex Deucher
(In reply to Andy Furniss from comment #3) > Thanks, that works. > > This is the same with non dc, but is there a reason they are a bit low? > > 1920x1080 (0x5b) 285.500MHz +HSync -VSync > h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock > 137.26KHz > v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1144 clock > 119.98Hz > > 1920x1080 (0x5c) 260.250MHz +HSync -VSync > h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock > 125.12KHz > v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1138 clock > 109.95Hz > > 1920x1080 (0x5d) 235.500MHz +HSync -VSync > h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew 0 clock > 113.22KHz > v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1133 clock > 99.93Hz > > I was hoping DC would differ from the old driver in giving exact Hz for > these. Those are the modes from the EDID from your monitor: CEA extension block Extension version: 1 0 8-byte timing descriptors Detailed mode: Clock 235.500 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm 1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0 1080 1083 1088 1133 vborder 0 +hsync -vsync Detailed mode: Clock 260.250 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm 1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0 1080 1083 1088 1138 vborder 0 +hsync -vsync Detailed mode: Clock 285.500 MHz, 521 mm x 293 mm 1920 1968 2000 2080 hborder 0 1080 1083 1088 1144 vborder 0 +hsync -vsync
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
