On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:09:39AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> On Friday, 12 January 2018 00:06:06 EET Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday, 11 January 2018 15:12:56 EET Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 03:05:01PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday, 10 January 2018 17:59:41 EET Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > >>> The devm_regulator_get_optional function, unlike it was assumed in the
> > >>> commit a1c55bccf600 ("drm/panel: lvds: Add support for the power-supply
> > >>> property"), is actually returning an error pointer with -ENODEV instead
> > >>> of NULL when there's no regulator to find.
> > >>>
> > >>> Make sure we handle that case properly.
> > >>>
> > >>> Fixes: a1c55bccf600 ("drm/panel: lvds: Add support for the power-supply
> > >>> property") Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> > >>> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> ---
> > >>>
> > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lvds.c | 9 +++++++--
> > >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >>>
> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lvds.c
> > >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lvds.c index 57e38a9e7ab4..9f46e7095c0e
> > >>> 100644
> > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lvds.c
> > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-lvds.c
> > >>> @@ -215,8 +215,13 @@ static int panel_lvds_probe(struct platform_device
> > >>> *pdev)
> > >>> lvds->supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(lvds->dev, "power");
> > >>> if (IS_ERR(lvds->supply)) {
> > >>> ret = PTR_ERR(lvds->supply);
> > >>> - dev_err(lvds->dev, "failed to request regulator: %d\n", ret);
> > >>> - return ret;
> > >>> +
> > >>> + if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> > >>> + dev_err(lvds->dev, "failed to request regulator: %d\n", ret);
> > >>> + return ret;
> > >>
> > >> I wouldn't print an error message if ret == -EPROBE_DEFER.
> > >>
> > >>> + } else {
> > >>> + lvds->supply = NULL;
> > >>> + }
> > >>> }
> > >>
> > >> How about
> > >>
> > >> lvds->supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(lvds->dev, "power");
> > >> if (IS_ERR(lvds->supply)) {
> > >> ret = PTR_ERR(lvds->supply);
> > >> if (ret != -ENODEV) {
> > >> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > >
> > > I guess that would be != -EPROBE_DEFER
> >
> > Of course, my bad.
> >
> > >> dev_err(lvds->dev, "failed to request regulator: %d\n", ret);
> > >> return ret;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> lvds->supply = NULL;
> > >> }
> > >
> > > Otherwise, it works for me.
>
> With the above change,
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to drm-misc-next-fixes.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
