On Thu, 11 Jan 2018, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My preference, however, would be for devm_regulator_get_optional() to return > NULL when no regulator is present. The current implementation returns -ENODEV > in multiple cases, making it impossible to properly discriminate between > having no regulator and not being able to get the regulator due to an error. Just a word of warning, IS_ERR(NULL) is false, and your proposed change would apparently require quite a churn all over the kernel. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
