On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:09 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:25 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> When building AOSP after updating libdrm project to the >>> freedesktop/master branch, I've seen the following build errors: >>> >>> external/libdrm/intel/Android.mk: error: libdrm_intel >> >> This is only needed for i915 (not i965) now BTW. I'm not sure at what >> point we stop caring about i915. >> >>> (SHARED_LIBRARIES android-arm64) missing libpciaccess >>> (SHARED_LIBRARIES android-arm64) You can set >>> ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true in your environment if this is >>> intentional, but that may defer real problems until later in the >>> build. >>> >>> Using ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true when building allows >>> things to function properly, but is not ideal. >>> >>> So basically, while I'm not including the libdrm_intel package >>> into the build, just the fact that the Android.mk file references >>> libpciaccess which isn't a repo included in AOSP causes the build >>> failure. >>> >>> So it seems we need some sort of conditional filter in the >>> Android.mk to skip over it if we're not building for intel. >>> >>> This is my initial attempt at solving this. >>> >>> Feedback would be greatly appreciated! >>> >>> I note that in the AOSP version of libdrm, the reference to >>> libpciaccess has been removed. See: >>> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/libdrm/+/f6a1130dffae8de9ddd0c379066daf1df27fc8af%5E%21/ >>> So I wonder if it make sense to instead remove this upstream as >>> well? >> >> Only if we drop i915. > > To be more precise, drop i915 for Android builds (I'm not suggesting > dropping it elsewhere, just for the Android.mk). I'm really not sure > which devices might be affected. Anyone able to point me to someone in > Intel who would know? The android-x86 folks would be the ones to ask. I added Chih-Wei. >>> +ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH), x86) >> >> This doesn't work for x86_64. i915 and 64-bit may not be a valid >> combination, not sure, but we do at least build test that. > > Out of curiosity, which environment is being used for this build > testing? Are you describing your generic-build/qemu work or something > else done as part of freedesktop.org? The CI job I setup to build mesa master (and libdrm implicitly). Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
