Re: [PATCH] libdrm: intel/Android.mk: Filter libdrm_intel library requirements on x86

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:48 AM, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:25 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> When building AOSP after updating libdrm project to the
>> freedesktop/master branch, I've seen the following build errors:
>>
>> external/libdrm/intel/Android.mk: error: libdrm_intel
>
> This is only needed for i915 (not i965) now BTW. I'm not sure at what
> point we stop caring about i915.
>
>> (SHARED_LIBRARIES android-arm64) missing libpciaccess
>> (SHARED_LIBRARIES android-arm64) You can set
>> ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true in your environment if this is
>> intentional, but that may defer real problems until later in the
>> build.
>>
>> Using ALLOW_MISSING_DEPENDENCIES=true when building allows
>> things to function properly, but is not ideal.
>>
>> So basically, while I'm not including the libdrm_intel package
>> into the build, just the fact that the Android.mk file references
>> libpciaccess which isn't a repo included in AOSP causes the build
>> failure.
>>
>> So it seems we need some sort of conditional filter in the
>> Android.mk to skip over it if we're not building for intel.
>>
>> This is my initial attempt at solving this.
>>
>> Feedback would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> I note that in the AOSP version of libdrm, the reference to
>> libpciaccess has been removed. See:
>>  https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/libdrm/+/f6a1130dffae8de9ddd0c379066daf1df27fc8af%5E%21/
>> So I wonder if it make sense to instead remove this upstream as
>> well?
>
> Only if we drop i915.

To be more precise, drop i915 for Android builds (I'm not suggesting
dropping it elsewhere, just for the Android.mk). I'm really not sure
which devices might be affected. Anyone able to point me to someone in
Intel who would know?


>> +ifeq ($(TARGET_ARCH), x86)
>
> This doesn't work for x86_64. i915 and 64-bit may not be a valid
> combination, not sure, but we do at least build test that.

Out of curiosity, which environment is being used for this build
testing?  Are you describing your generic-build/qemu work or something
else done as part of freedesktop.org?

thanks
-john
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux