On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 00:48 +0000, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-21 at 08:53 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Occasionally there are LINK_ADDRESS sideband messages timing out with the > > > Lenovo MST dock + Dell MST monitor(w/ in-built branch) setup I have. These > > > failures lead to the display not coming up on boot. Power cycling the port > > > corresponding to the MST monitor's branch device and resending the message > > > fixes the issue. I am not entirely sure if this is specific to my setup. > > > However, as the power state is toggled conditionally on LINK_ADDRESS > > > timeouts, this should not affect the working cases. > > > > With stuff like this, I always wonder if catering for a failing setup > > blocks us from improving working setups, because once we add this, we > > can't regress it. For example, is there a valid scenario where we'd want > > to fail fast here, instead of retrying? > > Link address failure would result in not probing a branch device that > already has been detected. I guess the fail fast case will be applicable > if the said device was not really present but the parent branch told us > otherwise. > The other option is we could check the device ID of the dock and implement this as a quirk. Btw I found some relevant information in the spec. "The Message Transaction originator must perform the reply timeout check. If an error to a request causes the system to be in an invalid state (e.g., all nodes failed to delete a virtual channel, it is the responsibility of the Message Transaction originator to return the system to a valid state). The Message Transaction originator is responsible for any retries." and "SET_POWER_STATE Must be programmed to 001 (binary) upon power-on reset or an upstream device disconnect. 001 = Set local Sink device and all downstream Sink devices to D0 (normal operation mode)." I wonder if the dock is missing this step because the monitor seems to work well with a discrete MST hub. > > > > Some nits below. > > > > > Cc: Lyude <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > index 70dcfa58d3c2..e06defcdcf18 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > > @@ -1596,8 +1596,9 @@ static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > > > int len; > > > struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *txmsg; > > > int ret; > > > + int attempts = 5; > > > > > > - txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); > > > +retry: txmsg = kzalloc(sizeof(*txmsg), GFP_KERNEL); > > > if (!txmsg) > > > return; > > > > > > @@ -1635,9 +1636,17 @@ static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > > > } > > > (*mgr->cbs->hotplug)(mgr); > > > } > > > + } else if (attempts--) { > > > > You'll end up doing (attempts + 1) attempts, including the first one. > Yeah, that is what I intended to do :) I renamed it from 'retry' to > 'attempt' at the last moment, which made it a bit confusing I suppose. > > > I am stressing testing my setup more to see how well this recovery works > and update this patch. > Here's what I got with 266 rounds of reboots. Correct link address at 1st try 180 Retry 1 45 Retry 2 32 Retry 3 0 Retry 4 0 Retry 5 2 Giving up 3 Incorrect link address 4 The retries help about 30% of the cases. > > > > > > > + kfree(txmsg); > > > > How about memset(txmsg, 0, sizoef(*txmsg)); here and move the goto label > > down to avoid repeated allocations? > Absolutely. > > > > > > + drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(mstb->mgr, mstb->port_parent, > > > + false); > > > + drm_dp_send_power_updown_phy(mstb->mgr, mstb->port_parent, > > > + true); > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address failed %d, retrying\n", ret); > > > > Maybe do the debug message before you power down/up? > Ok. > > > > BR, > > Jani. > > > > > + goto retry; > > > } else { > > > mstb->link_address_sent = false; > > > - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address failed %d\n", ret); > > > + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address failed %d, giving up\n", ret); > > > } > > > > > > kfree(txmsg); > > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel