Hi Heiko,
On Monday, 4 December 2017 15:46:32 EET Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2017, 15:22:07 CET schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> > > From: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> > > 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
> > > /#{addres,size}-cells.
> > >
> > > v4:
> > > * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
> > > * separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly
> > >
> > > independent of the driver refactoring
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As I hadn't pushed that one yet, I've amended it with your Review-tag :-)
Thank you :-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
