Hi Nickey,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 29 November 2017 20:47:55 EET Brian Norris wrote:
> From: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> We might include additional ports in derivative device trees, so the
> 'port' node should have an address, and the parent 'ports' node needs
> /#{addres,size}-cells.
>
> v4:
> * keep #{address,size}-cells in both 'ports' and 'port@0' nodes
> * separate from the rest of the series, since this is mostly
> independent of the driver refactoring
>
> Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi index d340b58ab184..c6dae25a3f23
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -1652,7 +1652,11 @@
> status = "disabled";
>
> ports {
> - mipi_in: port {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + mipi_in: port@0 {
> + reg = <0>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <0>;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
