Am 29.11.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Michal Srb:
The io_mem_pfn field was added in commit ea642c3216cb2a60d1c0e760ae47ee85c9c16447
and is called unconditionally. However, not all drivers were updated to set it.
Use the ttm_bo_default_io_mem_pfn function if a driver did not set its own.
Signed-off-by: Michal Srb <msrb@xxxxxxxx>
NAK, when we have drivers missing this we should set this in the driver
and not add the workaround here.
Which driver is missing this? I thought I fixed all of them.
Regards,
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
index c8ebb757e36b..e25a99bc519d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
@@ -234,7 +234,10 @@ static int ttm_bo_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
if (bo->mem.bus.is_iomem) {
/* Iomem should not be marked encrypted */
cvma.vm_page_prot = pgprot_decrypted(cvma.vm_page_prot);
- pfn = bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
+ if (bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn)
+ pfn = bdev->driver->io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
+ else
+ pfn = ttm_bo_default_io_mem_pfn(bo, page_offset);
} else {
page = ttm->pages[page_offset];
if (unlikely(!page && i == 0)) {
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
