[Bug 103697] [regression] shared memory size 64k -> 32k?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Comment # 4 on bug 103697 from
Many thanks for your consideration - That would be great!
Our application is real time image processing and display. The main computing
effort is delay-and-sum beamforming.
Source and destination data sets are much larger than LDS so we need to do
block processing. This causes additional LDS <-> GPURAM traffic essentially
inversely proportional to block (LDS) size. A 32k vs 64k limit (and thus twice
the RAM traffic) therefore causes quite a performance hit.
Anyway: Mesa's OpenGL performance on AMD Radeons is quite amazing. Great job!


You are receiving this mail because:
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux