On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 03:05:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to > >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() > >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. > >> > >> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Do you expect drm folks to apply this, or is this part of a larger refactoring? > > If the drm tree includes -rc3, you can carry these. If you don't want > to carry these and want the timer tree to carry them, we can do that > too. Applied to drm-misc-next for 4.16 (we're way past freeze for 4.15 already). Thanks, Daniel > > > A notch more context in the commit message would help ... > > Sorry about that, my added context for this go lost in later conversion patches. > > -Kees > > -- > Kees Cook > Pixel Security > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
